One thing that I
have stumbled upon recently has been the issue of language and words we use and
how it affects our thoughts. It has primarily come about by listening to and
reading Bohm who also was a linguist and had an obsession about finding out the
origins of a word and going to the root of it and then more importantly
comparing it with what that word is trying to describe and see if it fits. Well
he didn’t try to see if it fits. He raised the questions and leaves it to the
reader to make up his or her mind. A true philosopher who was not strait
jacketed by any belief system and bogged by concepts and steadfastly believed
in dialogue and arguments to talk things through and see if things can be made
clearer.
Apart from using the
correct word at the appropriate time, Bohm also shed light on problems the
Subject-Verb arrangement of words does in our thought process. In English we have
to have a subject who needs to be doing something or something needs to be happening
to it for there to be a complete grammatically correct sentence. This happening
or doing is denoted by the verb.
So for e.g. we can
have a sentence like:
Ram
Laughed
Subject+ Verb.
So a two word
sentence( subject and verb) would be the
shortest possible sentence in English. IN such a format the subject takes
exaggerated importance. There has to be a doer of action for there to be
action. This is in contradiction to lot of eastern philosophy( hindu,buddhist)
where we say there is action. The Verb
is all important in that set up.
Bohm then gives the example of a common English
expression " it is raining".
What is this
"it" that is raining. Logically we should say "Rain is falling of "There is
rain"
Bohm says this is
due to our contrived way of thinking and giving so much importance to the
subject and not being able to think wholly and just seeing things in parts.
While it may seem as
an extreme example, you can see the point he is trying to make from a larger
philosophical point of view. If we accept that language shapes our thoughts then
surely when we learn to make sentences where the doer of the action is going to
be paramount that shapes in our mind an image of the importance of the
individual. The "I". The "ego' .That becomes our default setting
if you will.the way we look and interpret things and event.
if some ill luck befalls us and we are in rut we think of people to blame it on or blame ourselves for it. We find difficulty in accepting that things just happen and there maybe no one to blame for it. There was no grand cosmic plan to fail us on that day .Things happen. You handle the present moment and then you move on to the next moment. Or maybe you don’t move on anywhere, the next moment happens and you react in it
if some ill luck befalls us and we are in rut we think of people to blame it on or blame ourselves for it. We find difficulty in accepting that things just happen and there maybe no one to blame for it. There was no grand cosmic plan to fail us on that day .Things happen. You handle the present moment and then you move on to the next moment. Or maybe you don’t move on anywhere, the next moment happens and you react in it
So stuff to munch
on,,this subject verb thing and on a wider scale how language shapes our
thoughts.
No comments:
Post a Comment